Home / Latest Update / Ize-Iyamu Vs Obaseki: Anxiety As Edo Tribunal Reserves Date For Judgement

Ize-Iyamu Vs Obaseki: Anxiety As Edo Tribunal Reserves Date For Judgement

Edo State Governor, Godwin Obaseki of the All Progressives Congress, ​(APC) ​and the Peoples Democratic Party governorship candidate in the September 28 governorship election, Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu, will soon know their fate as the election tribunal on Monday reserved a date to deliver judgment.

Pastor Ize-Iyamu had filed a petition before the tribunal asking the tribunal to declare him winner of the elections based on alleged non-accreditation, over voting and non-compliance with the electoral act.

The three man panel headed by Justice Ahmed Badamasi said a date to deliver the judgement would be communicated to parties involved in the suit after the parties adopted their written addresses.

Counsel to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Onyechi Ikpeazu, ‎told the tribunal to dismiss Ize-Iyamu’s petition as the petitioners failed to establish instances of over-voting by not tendering the voter register, ballot papers, the recounted ballot papers and the outcome of the recounting exercise as evidence.

Ikpeazu ‎said the proof of over-voting must be done polling unit by polling unit, rather than covering only 29 out of all the polling units in the state.

Lead counsel to Obaseki, Chief Wole Olanipekun, urged the tribunal to dismiss the Petition on grounds that the identity of the first petitioner and who was sponsored by the PDP were different.

His words, “They could not prove anything. They are holding onto any straw. They don’t know what they want. They didn’t tender anything. What is remaining is carcasses.”

“The straw of corrupt practices and non-compliance raised by the petitioners was weak as they could not prove anything. The first petitioner’s claim that he got majority votes and won the election was undoable”.

Counsel to the APC, Lateef Fagbemi, told the tribunal that the petitioners failed to substantiate their claim of electoral irregularities in their pleadings, evidence and address.

“I urged your lordship to hold that the petitioners have failed. There is no leg on which the deposition stand. They did not establish over-voting. If there was deduction in the recount of results declared by INEC, APC will still win by 58, 696 votes.

Lead counsel to the petitioners, Yusuf Alli, said the most logical thing for the tribunal to do was to dismiss the submission of the respondents as there was merit in all the complaints of the petitioners.

Ali stated that allegation of non-compliance with the electoral law was made against INEC but the electoral body failed to present any witness ‎to answer to the allegation.

He however urged the court to uphold the petition and declared the petitioners as the winners of the election.

“I urge the court to hold that there is merit in all the complaints of the petitioners and as result of the merit the petitioners should be declared as the duly elected candidate of the election”, he stated.

“All said my lords, I pray you, sir, that there is merit in all the complaints of the petitioners. And that as a result of the merit of the complaints, the petitioners are entitled to be declared as the duly elected governor of Edo State from the election of September 28, 2016.‎”

About MasterGee

A passionate blogger. People need to know whats happening around them. Exclusives provides that opportunity for me. I Am EXCLUSIVES.COM.NG

Check Also

DJ Spinall Ft. Reekado Banks – Buddy

Off DJ Spinall’s just released debut album ”Dreams” . We present a new single titled …

Leave a Reply